This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of three regime-based portfolio allocation strategies tested over different time horizons. We compare: (1) an original regime-detection strategy with Bitcoin (V1, 2019-2025), (2) an improved version with dynamic optimization (V2, 2019-2025), and (3) a long-term test without Bitcoin (2000-2025).
Our findings challenge the conventional wisdom that increased complexity leads to superior returns. Through rigorous backtesting and honest assessment of multiple bias sources, we demonstrate that a traditional 60/40 portfolio outperforms sophisticated machine learning approaches after accounting for transaction costs and implementation challenges.
